Additionally, the court found that Facundo promised to complete the work within 120 days, but that the work was never completed, and that Facundo abandoned the job after 18 months. The court awarded Solis more than the $37,475 that she paid to Facundo because it found that Facundo s work was substandard and would require additional work to complete and correct. It awarded $50,525 to Solis to correct Facundo s work and complete the work that was left undone, and $15,000 for attorney s fees, for a total judgment of $65,525.
#Juanita solis trial
After conducting a bench trial, the trial court rendered judgment for Solis. Facundo concedes that at the time the project was terminated, she had not corrected her subcontractors mistakes or finished the work on the house for which she had been compensated. Solis eventually terminated the project due to delays in completion and a request by Facundo for an additional $1,765 to make further changes. Due to the changes, delays caused by subcontractors, and absences by both Solis and Facundo, the project remained incomplete as of July 2003. Both Solis and Facundo made changes to the work covered by the contract. The total amount of the contracts was $37,750, and the estimated time of completion was 90 to 120 days.
#Juanita solis upgrade
Facundo later contracted to upgrade Solis s kitchen for an additional $3,800. The parties initial contract, for $33,950, covered the enlarging of the house to include a master bedroom, an efficiency bathroom and a washer-dryer alcove. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND In February 2002, Facundo submitted a bid to remodel Solis s home in the Travis Heights neighborhood of Austin. In three points of error, Facundo challenges the admission of expert testimony and the award of damages in excess of the amount sought in the original petition. The trial court issued findings of fact and conclusions of law, and denied Facundo s motion for a new trial. After a bench trial, the district court rendered judgment in Solis s favor for $65,525. GN303391, HONORABLE DARLENE BYRNE, JUDGE PRESIDING 44444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellee Juanita Solis brought suit against appellant Irma Facundo for breach of contract, deceptive trade practices and fraud. They also want to ask for continued prayers for a healthy recovery.TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN 444444444444444 NO. Juanita and Andy would like to thank everyone in advance for all the love and support we can show them. bills, hospital stays, hotel stays, expensive medications that she will have to continue for the rest of her life, travel expenses, and as usual all monthly payments. We can ease their worries by helping with Dr. We are asking our families and friends for their help during this stressful time for help with medical expenses. During this time her husband Andy Pena has been by her side and he has not been able to go back to work. She is currently still hospitalized in San Antonio.
Unfortunately she was re-admitted on Monday Septemafter feeling nauseous and running a fever. She was in the hospital for a week and released the following Friday September 17, 2021. Her body has accepted the kidney, and for this we thank God. That same evening Juanita had a kidney transplant at Methodist Hospital Specialty Transplant in San Antonio, Tx. Juanita and her husband Andy got the long-awaited call on Friday, September 10, 2021. After being on dialysis for seven grueling years, God has answered her prayers by blessing her with a kidney donor.